I went to have a look at the Schilling web site and oddly enough they don't think Alisher is worthy of a place in their what we do section. I suppose putting "we close down websites for really dodgy people who feel threatened by the truth" just isn't going to fit with their corporate image.
It's not that I have a thing against lawyers, both my parents are and I understand that there is a necessary divorcing of the legal and personal views of a client so I can't blame them for taking him on. The tactics that they use is something that they are responsible for though. There's also another thing that bothers me:
"As well as practicing law, our partners are pivotal in creating it"
Is it just me or do the rest of you think that's a job for Parliament?
Libertarian meat eater, right wing in the sense of conservative with a small c.
Friday, 21 September 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Links
Blog Archive
-
▼
2007
(44)
-
▼
September
(20)
- Ethics
- Australians, very sporting chaps
- Best simile of the year
- Psi Corps
- Guns
- Schilling and Alisher Usmanov
- Martin Samuel
- Arsenal His Ovum
- Neil Harding is an idiot
- Barnett, West Lothian, etc.
- Spanky lesbian pixie wenches
- Idiocy twined with sanity
- Signs of stupidity
- Tomorrow belongs to me
- Some good news for once
- Caveat Emptor
- Some people never learn to count
- Rugby
- Smirk gone
- Slight smirk
-
▼
September
(20)
No comments:
Post a Comment